I spent a little over 20 years in the United States Air Force. Joining shortly before the attacks of September 11th, I had high hopes to become some mix between Jack Ryan and Ethan Hunt, fighting bad guys using my advanced military intelligence skills.
In reality, I spent the bulk of my career as a number cruncher, staring blindly at Excel spreadsheets, managing reports that generally went nowhere, and purchasing various items for the “warfighter,” all in the noble trade of Resource Management. I was what was jokingly referred to as a “Combat Comptroller.”
While much of my work was beneficial to the units I was assigned to, I bore witness to my fair share of military waste. Every year around the same time, the expectation to spend! spend! spend! regardless of the need or validity was echoed down from the highest rung to the lowest of the chain of command.
We’ve all heard the usual reports on government waste from billion-dollar weapons systems that don’t work and “creative” accounting meant to hide the actual purchase behind the $30,000 toilet seats. But it’s the everyday waste that chips away at our national security, and not just because of the fiscal implications.
Wake me up when September ends
For the federal government, September is viewed as Christmas or Crunch Time, depending on your perspective. The Fiscal Year is coming to a close.
Federal agencies begin the mad dash to spend all their money before the clock strikes midnight on the 30th for fear Congress won’t bless them with the same, if not more, funding the following year. Starting around June, commanders send their “unfunded requirements” to their servicing financial management office in hopes that their higher command leadership rates their requirements at the top of the list for the spending spree that will soon occur in a few months.
The goal levied on resource managers and Commanders is to “get to zero,” meaning spend all the money they got that year and any money that comes trickling down from higher command. Commanders and military leaders of all flavors receive accolades for spending as much as possible.
Read that again.
They often get the dollar figures and statistics emblazoned on their promotion reports and military decorations. It didn’t matter if the items purchased were needed, let alone used.
Year after year, I facilitated the purchase of copious amounts of office furniture to “replace” non-existent office furniture. The furniture would often be stored next to the previous year’s unopened new office furniture in a forgotten storage room on base.
Worse yet was establishing what was known in the day as the End of Year MORD. A MORD is a miscellaneous obligation/reimbursement document, an accounting tool used to officially set aside funds in an obligation status to fulfill a future billing submission.
However, in many cases, the document was used solely to creatively take the base’s funds down to an even $0 by midnight, letting a future Commander deal with the explanation as to why those funds were set aside for seemingly no reason. But no explanation would matter because any checks and balances on military resources is an exercise in futility.
Same song and dance
This year, the Department of Defense failed its sixth consecutive audit. Not only did the DOD fail, they got almost identical results to the year prior.
After last year’s audit failure, the Subcommittee on National Security, the Border, and Foreign Affairs, in conjunction with the Subcommittee on Government Operations and the Federal Workforce, held a joint hearing titled Beyond the Budget: Addressing Financial Accountability in the Department of Defense. At the hearing, it was discovered that over 300 legacy control systems are failing in their intended mission.
That mission is to track and execute the resources of the United States military. Director of Financial Management and Assurance at the Government Accountability Office Asif Khan told members of Congress that he was:
“…unable to find any system within DOD that works as intended.”
Make no mistake, these systems aren’t cheap; they cost millions and, at times, billions of dollars to maintain and operate. Millions and billions of dollars to continue to exist while simultaneously failing at their advertised purpose.
Who benefits from all of this waste? There are the usual suspects, of course, such as the Eisenhower dubbed military-industrial complex.
RELATED: The Legacy Of the United States’ Secret Wars, Past and Present
A CBS investigative report this year uncovered massive price gouging by defense contractors, undoubtedly made easier thanks to the inept accounting processes within the DOD. The investigation found that while the DOD sets a general fixed price of 12% to 15% for private profits – overcharges from companies like Lockheed Martin, Boeing, Raytheon, and TransDigm allowed for profits ranging from 40% to a staggering 4,000%.
Focusing solely on the defense corporations as the winners is just as short-sighted as placing blame on old accounting systems desperately needing updating.
The Pentagon fails its SIXTH audit in a row! THE department that's responsible for WARS – CAN'T account for where the money is going…
Latest News
